Politics

High court declares UK asylum guidance unlawful in trafficking cases tied to France returns

London's High Court has struck down Home Office changes designed to speed up removals under the UK-France migrant deal, ruling they fell short of legal duties to identify trafficking victims. The decision exposes the fragility of executive efforts to secure Britain's borders against relentless judicial second-guessing.
Listen
AI-generated image: High court declares UK asylum guidance unlawful in trafficking cases tied to France returns
AI-generated image for illustrative purposes.
Intelligent summary
  • The High Court ruled the Home Office's September 2025 amendment to modern slavery guidance unlawful because it removed reconsideration rights for those facing removal to France.
  • Mr Justice Sheldon found the process failed to meet the robust and effective standard required by the Modern Slavery Act 2015, noting that 79 percent of reconsidered negative decisions became positive in 2025.
  • The government will appeal the judgment, which threatens the modest returns achieved under the UK-France one-in-one-out treaty that had seen 377 people returned by early March 2026.

Britain's border policy lies crippled once again by the courts. On 10 July 2026 London's High Court declared the Home Office's amended modern slavery guidance unlawful, a ruling that directly sabotages attempts to return failed asylum seekers and small-boat arrivals to France under a bilateral treaty.

The amendment, introduced in September 2025, had removed the right for those facing removal to France and certain other countries to demand reconsideration of a negative trafficking decision. Five claimants identified only as AYA, EXR, HRE, GIP and KAG brought the case. Each had been removed or stood on the brink of removal under the UK-France arrangement. Mr Justice Sheldon ruled the revised process failed the test of being robust and effective under section 49 of the Modern Slavery Act 2015.

His central indictment was merciless in its logic. A decision-making process which was not robust and effective could not have been within Parliament’s contemplation. He added that arrangements which deprive the decision-maker of material evidence means that there are bound to be many cases where a victim of human trafficking will not be identified.

a decision-making process which was not robust and effective could not have been within Parliament’s contemplation

The statistics expose the scale of the problem the government had tried to address. In 2025, 79 percent of reconsidered negative trafficking decisions flipped to positive. Last-minute claims had become a well-worn route to frustrate lawful removal. Yet the court has now restored that avenue, prioritising the remote chance of decisive late evidence over the practical need for swift decisions within roughly five days.

This is the familiar pattern of judicial intervention in migration. Executive attempts to regain control are dismantled by expansive readings of statutory duties, even when those duties were never intended to paralyse returns. The UK-France 'one in, one out' scheme, which swaps small-boat arrivals returned to France for an equivalent number admitted from France who have not crossed illegally, has managed only modest results. As of early March 2026 just 377 people had been returned and 380 admitted. That trickle is now under fresh threat.

The Home Office response struck the right note of realism. A spokesperson said last-minute modern slavery claims must not be used to frustrate the removal of illegal migrants. We are reforming our laws to stop dubious last-minute claims, while strengthening protections for those who need them.