Controversies

Green party leader faces backlash after opposing deportation of Rochdale grooming gang ringleader

Zack Polanski argued on national television that the UK should not deport Shabir Ahmed, the convicted ringleader of the Rochdale grooming gang, insisting rule of law demands he serve any further time in a British prison. The remarks have sparked fury from those who see them as detached from the suffering of victims and the basic duty to protect communities from serious offenders.
Listen
AI-generated image: Green party leader faces backlash after opposing deportation of Rochdale grooming gang ringleader
AI-generated image for illustrative purposes.
Intelligent summary
  • Zack Polanski argued against deporting Shabir Ahmed, saying the UK should follow the rule of law and keep him in prison if he remains a threat.
  • Ahmed, convicted in 2012 of raping girls as young as 13, was released in early July 2026 after serving about 14 years.
  • Pakistan has refused to accept him after he renounced citizenship, prompting government plans to change immigration law.
  • Polanski's comments on Good Morning Britain triggered widespread criticism for appearing detached from victims' experiences and public concern over grooming gang offenders.

Zack Polanski stepped onto Good Morning Britain last week and promptly walked into a storm. The Green Party leader declared it made no sense to deport Shabir Ahmed, the man who ran the Rochdale grooming gang. His crimes were committed here, Polanski said, so Britain should keep him locked up rather than send him anywhere else.

Ahmed was convicted in 2012 of multiple counts of rape and sexual offences against girls as young as 13. He walked out of prison on or around 2 July after serving roughly 14 years of a longer sentence. The government stripped him of British citizenship years ago and wants him sent to Pakistan. Pakistan has refused, claiming he renounced its citizenship and the problem belongs to the UK.

An old quirk in the Immigration Act 1971 has long shielded certain Commonwealth citizens who arrived before 1971 from deportation. The current government says it will change the law to close that loophole and remove Ahmed along with others like him. Officials insist they are exploring every option.

Rule of law or common sense?

Polanski took a different line. He told viewers deportation decisions should not be made case by case. The UK must follow the rule of law, he argued. If Ahmed still poses a threat, keep him in a British prison instead of releasing him to cause problems elsewhere. The crimes happened in Britain, so the punishment should stay here too.

Those words landed like a lead balloon. Backlash erupted across social media and from political figures who see the position as tone-deaf at best. Victims of the grooming gangs, their families and large parts of the public have spent years watching authorities fumble these cases. The last thing they want is abstract lectures about procedural purity while a ringleader walks free in the UK.

The tension is simple. One side talks rule of law and consistency. The other sees a convicted predator who exploited vulnerable British girls and now cannot be removed because of legal contortions and foreign refusal. Communities in places like Rochdale remember how police and councils hesitated for fear of racism claims. That failure left real girls damaged. Public patience for similar abstractions has run out.