Opinion

Green leader's grooming gang defence shows exactly why voters are done with the lot of them

Zack Polanski says deporting the Rochdale ringleader doesn't make sense and we should keep him here instead. This isn't rule of law. It's the same twisted logic that let these monsters roam free for years while authorities looked the other way.
Listen
AI-generated image: Green leader's grooming gang defence shows exactly why voters are done with the lot of them
AI-generated image for illustrative purposes.
Intelligent summary
  • Green Party leader Zack Polanski argued against deporting Rochdale grooming gang ringleader Shabir Ahmed, claiming it doesn't make sense and that threats should be contained in British prisons.
  • Ahmed was convicted of multiple rapes of girls as young as 13, served part of a 22-year sentence, and remains in the UK under supervision after Pakistan refused to accept him.
  • The comments triggered widespread fury with critics accusing Polanski of prioritising the offender over victims and public safety.

So the leader of the Green Party pops up on Good Morning Britain to tell us it doesn't make sense to deport Shabir Ahmed. The man who ran the Rochdale grooming gang. The one convicted of raping girls as young as 13. Apparently sending him back to Pakistan would break some sacred rule of law.

Let's get this straight. Ahmed got 22 years. Served about 14. Released early July. Stripped of his British citizenship. Pakistan won't take him. And now he's wandering around under tag and an exclusion zone around Rochdale. Where the victims live. Where their families still wake up every day knowing what he did.

Polanski's line was crystal clear. Deportation decisions shouldn't be made case by case. If Ahmed is still a threat, keep him in a British prison rather than export the problem. As GB News reported, he argued we must follow the rule of law above all.

Rule of law? The same rule of law that let these gangs operate for years because police and social workers didn't want to look racist? The same authorities who ignored parents begging for help? That rule of law protected the perpetrators, not the girls.

Ahmed wasn't some unlucky migrant caught up in a paperwork nightmare. He was the daddy of the operation. Multiple rapes. Trafficking. The lot. And after all that, we're told case-by-case consideration is somehow dangerous. What planet are these people on?

The victims don't get case-by-case excuses

The girls didn't get to argue their age or background or anything else. They were prey. British working-class girls mostly. Overlooked. Dismissed. Their suffering turned into an inconvenient statistic for the diversity box-tickers.