Environment

Planning experts warn new buildings risk overheating death traps without better standards

A joint report from planning bodies reveals that nearly half of emerging local plans in England fail to require cooling or ventilation strategies for new developments, leaving vulnerable residents exposed during heatwaves. The findings expose a persistent gap between stated climate ambitions and concrete policies that could deliver genuine resilience.
Listen
AI-generated image: Planning experts warn new buildings risk overheating death traps without better standards
AI-generated image for illustrative purposes.
Intelligent summary
  • Just over half of emerging local plans in England require cooling or ventilation strategies for new buildings, leaving nearly half without such safeguards.
  • The RTPI and TCPA report highlights a stark gap between widespread climate ambitions in local plans and limited concrete policies on overheating.
  • Recent heatwaves in May and June 2026 were linked to around 2700 excess deaths, underscoring the human cost of inadequate planning standards.
  • The Future Homes Standard coming in 2028 does not cover schools, hospitals or care homes and may prove insufficient without attention to surrounding green space.

On 15 July 2026 the Royal Town Planning Institute and the Town and Country Planning Association laid bare the uncomfortable reality facing new housing and public buildings across England. Their analysis of more than 700 local plan documents showed that just over half of emerging plans set any policy requirement for cooling or ventilation strategies to manage overheating. Nearly half do not.

This matters because extreme heat is no longer a distant prospect. Research published in July 2026 recorded around 2700 excess deaths during the heatwaves of May and June alone. The elderly, the very young and those in care homes or hospitals sit at greatest risk. Yet the planning system that is supposed to protect them remains half-formed.

The report, produced with an experimental artificial intelligence tool developed by Landstack, examined 327 adopted and 148 emerging local plans after rigorous data cleansing. Its authors acknowledged the methodology was novel and might contain some inaccuracies. They maintained, however, that it delivered a broadly reliable picture of current practice. That picture is one of ambition outstripping delivery.

Stated goals versus actual safeguards

Ninety-three per cent of emerging local plans and 86 per cent of adopted ones list climate change as a strategic objective. Less than half of adopted plans and 72 per cent of emerging ones contain a strategic policy on the subject. Only 11 per cent of adopted plans and 28 per cent of emerging plans were informed by a climate vulnerability assessment. Carbon assessments appear in just 2 per cent and 7 per cent respectively.

These figures accumulate into a quiet indictment. Local authorities speak of resilience while the detailed policies needed to achieve it remain patchy at best. The gap between rhetoric and regulatory muscle is now measurable in the number of buildings that could become uninhabitable during future heatwaves.

Celia Davis, senior projects and policy manager at the RTPI and interim director of operations at the TCPA, put the stakes plainly. "This is a matter of life and death. We need to avoid building death traps."